Wednesday, January 5, 2022

The real "big lie" about Jan. 6

Three totally separate and distinct events happened in Washington, D.C., last Jan. 6.

The United States Congress met to certify the votes of the Electoral College following the 2020 presidential election. During that certification, a number of senators and representatives objected to the seating of electors from certain states in which the elected officials felt were worthy of being challenged.

A political rally and protest took place on the National Mall, and some of the participants later took their protest to the grounds of the Capitol, where the vote certification was taking place.

Finally, a few of those who were protesting at the Capitol decided to enter the building in an attempt to disrupt the congressional proceedings.

Only one of these events was illegal or improper. The other two were totally and completely legitimate actions. Federal law and the Constitution spell out the process for certifying the Electoral College results and allow for challenges to the seating of electors. And political rallies and protests are one of the fundamental human rights enumerated in the First Amendment.

Yet, those on the left are trying to conflate those three events and claim that anyone who participated in the two legitimate and proper proceedings -- legislators who voted against certifying the election results and citizens who attended the rally -- is an insurrectionist and a traitor to the United States.

This claim is the real "big lie" about the 2020 presidential election. The same liberals who have championed the right to protest against government actions when Republicans are in charge are aghast that conservatives might challenge a proceeding that benefits Democrats.

Anyone who has been involved in the governmental bureaucracy or a corporate environment knows what "scope creep" is. This phenomenon happens when a project takes on a life of its own and expands far beyond its original intent. The investigation being undertaken by the House of Representative's Jan. 6 "select committee" is a textbook example of "scope creep."

Ostensibly formed to investigate how the rioters breached Capitol security and entered the building, the committee's focus has turned to the totally legitimate and lawful, legally and constitutionally enumerated process by which some sought to challenge the legitimacy of President Biden's election.

There's no evidence that any elected official organized a group of people to storm the Capitol. The sham committee should be trying to determine just why the Capitol Police stood down and allowed the incursion instead of trying to stop it. Instead, they're focusing on communication between prominent Republican officials, Trump administration personnel, and others; a PowerPoint presentation outlining a lawful method of carrying out an election challenge; and other things not related in any way to the violence that took place last year.

The idea that Donald Trump somehow ordered or controlled what happened is absurd. Trump never told anyone to commit a violent or illegal act. It's obvious that some people came ready to misbehave, but what happened is a classic example of a flash mob. When large numbers of people gather, emotions can run high, and a mob mentality can take over. "State Street" has become a cliché in Kentucky, because every time the University of Kentucky wins a big ballgame, revelers in Lexington congregate on the street near campus and there's usually a couch burning or two. Sometimes protests turn violent. Once upon a time, panty raids were common on college campuses. Groups of males would congregate outside women's dorms and ask the female occupants to toss undergarments out the windows to them. When I was a student at Morehead State University, one panty raid at what's known as the Mignon Complex (a group of women's dorms named after Mignon Doran, who was the wife of former MSU president Adron Doran) got out of control, and the participants ended up overturning a car.

There's a concept in logic called Occam's Razon. Summarized, it states that the simplest explanation for an event is usually the correct one. This perfectly describes the riot on Jan. 6. At its base, it was a flash mob gone wild. It wasn't organized by President Trump or any public official, and it wasn't some type of formal insurrection or coup.

And what of that investigative committee, anyway? It's painfully obvious it is acting not as an independent finder of fact, but is instead seeking to confirm a preconceived notion. There's nothing bipartisan or objective about it. The two Republicans on the team are Trump-haters. Democrat leaders in the House would not even allow anyone even remotely sympathetic to Trump, such as Rep. Jim Jordan from Ohio, to be on the committee. Going far beyond their original charge to figure out how the Capitol was breached, they're now treading on First Amendment territory by wanting to interview political commentator Sean Hannity over his communications with Trump administration officials and the president himself.

As for the election itself, the laughable "objective" journalists and liberal commentators continue to use the phrase "big lie" to describe Trump's claims that the 2020 election was not free, fair, and above-board. They continually use terms  like "untrue," "false," "unwarranted," and other similar words to describe the allegations. This in and of itself is an example of intellectual dishonesty. The correct phrase is "as-yet unproven" or an equivalent. To my knowledge, none of the various court cases challenging the results of the election have been decided on the merits of the case. They've all been dismissed for procedural reasons -- usually over who has standing to file the suit.

Was their hacking of electronic voting machines to alter the vote totals to favor Biden? Most likely not. Were there improprieties in voting via paper ballots, with the late-night ballot dumps and ballot harvesting? Probably so. Were there issues with the constitutionality of the way some states conducted their elections? Definitely.

The Constitution requires that state legislatures set the parameters for presidential elections in each individual state. As part of the reaction to the Wuhan Chinese virus, many states changed their voting procedures, but in most cases, those changes weren't approved by the state's legislatures as required. What happened in Kentucky was a prime example. The General Assembly never approved the changes that were made to the process. Working together, Gov. Andy Beshear (a Democrat) and Secretary of State Michael Adams (an establishment Republican) postponed the primary election date, allowed universal paper mail-in absentee balloting, and reduced the number of in-person polling places. The legislature did not sign off on these changes, and there's no provision in the Constitution that allows state legislatures to delegate this power to the executive branch.

But, back to Jan. 6. There's a continued attempt to lump those who attended the rally and protest and didn't engage in any improper activity in with the rioters who breached the Capitol with little resistance from the law enforcement officials whose duty it was to protect the building and its occupants. And legislators who followed a legal and constitutional process to object to the election are called insurrectionists by many who forget that a number of Democrats objected to the seating of electors in past elections won by Republicans.

We'll never know the real truth about Jan. 6. The media won't report the facts, and the congressional committee isn't interested in what really happened. Liberals in government and in the press will continue to push their own "big lie" and misuse their positions for partisan political and ideological gain -- I would say to the detriment of "democracy," but America isn't a democracy; it's a representative republic.

The populace needs to continue to view everything done by the Jan. 6 investigators with discernment and cynicism, knowing their underlying motivation and what they want the ultimate outcome to be.