The race for governor had not even been officially declared for Andy Beshear on Tuesday night, and one political pundit on Kentucky Educational Television's election-night coverage was declaring re-elected Agriculture Commissioner Ryan Quarles as the front-runner for the 2023 Republican nomination.
It's a logical name to throw out there, but is it the logical name?
The same week as the election may seem to be too early to start discussing who the Republicans should choose to take on Beshear in four years, but the reality is that the GOP needs to start thinking about this race now and begin working on its plan to unseat the new governor.
Much like the University of Kentucky's 2014-15 basketball season, the roster is loaded. (In all honesty, this year's slate was loaded as well, but Beshear played the role of Wisconsin.) All the statewide officers elected on Tuesday won by decisive margins, some against candidates with high name recognition and years of service, so it's a deep bench. Three of the officeholders will be term-limited and won't be able to seek re-election (the aforementioned Quarles, Auditor Mike Harmon, and Treasurer Allison Ball.) They'll possibly be looking to step up. Attorney General Daniel Cameron and Secretary of State Michael Adams will be in their first terms, and may choose to seek re-election than a move up at that point in their political careers.
All would definitely be formidable opponents for an incumbent Beshear. The three existing officeholders have done great jobs in their current positions. Ball led the ticket for the Republicans and has rejuvenated the duties of what is really a minor office. Harmon has done a methodical job as auditor, conducting himself in a bipartisan, impartial fashion. And Quarles has worked to modernize the state's agriculture industry, still a major economic engine, and is moving forward as hemp becomes a factor. Cameron and Adams are both attorneys. Cameron brings experience with Mitch McConnell, the leader of both the United States Senate and the state's rejuvenated Republican Party. Adams has experience working with other state executives in his role as an election lawyer.
Much depends on each individual's personal ambitions. Harmon and Quarles were both state legislators before moving into their executive elected positions. Ball is the mother of a young child and may prefer family time over the demands that the governorship would impose on her schedule.
Do any of these individuals stand out? Will they be jockeying amongst themselves for position at the top of the discussion list prior to the actual filing begins?
These are the first names that come to mind when you start talking about 2023 contenders, but they aren't the only ones. Rep. Jamie Comer lost the GOP primary to Bevin by only 83 votes in 2015, but found new political life when Ed Whitfield retired and Comer took his place as 1st District congressman. It seems that Comer has settled into his D.C. career, but sometimes it appears as if he never got over losing that race four years ago, and still has his eye on the governor's office.
None of the other members of the federal delegation would seem to be in the mix. All of them (Brett Guthrie, Thomas Massie, Hal Rogers, and Andy Barr) appear to be content with serving in Congress, and really have never looked to have designs on a Frankfort office during their tenures.
There may be some state legislators who are interested. Much as Rocky Adkins ran for the Democratic nomination this year, there might be a Republican who has their eyes on a bigger prize. It will be interesting to see if any outspoken leaders or fresh faces emerge as the General Assembly conducts business for the next few sessions. David Williams, when he was Senate president, sought to move up. There doesn't seem to be any indication that his successor, Robert Stivers, would be interested in following suit.
And, is there an unknown quantity out there? Another business person interested in stepping into politics? A Matt Bevin, a Wallace Wilkinson, a John Y. Brown, or even a Donald Trump? No one saw Bevin's rise to the governor's office coming, especially after his landslide loss to McConnell in the 2014 GOP Senate primary. Yet he pulled the upset in the primary, and then again in the general election.
Some may say it's too early to start looking toward 2023, but they're wrong. The time to start planning Beshear's defeat is now. There's a good team to choose from, and possibly some other players will emerge as we move forward. Keep an eye out for these political figures, and be on the lookout for an unknown, when campaigning starts for the next governor's race three years from now.
Commentary by H.B. Elkins, a lifelong Kentucky River Valley resident who left a career as an award-winning community newspaper editor for public relations. Reach him at hbelkins@gmail.com. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the writer, and do not represent any views of the writer's current or former employers. (Note to editors and publishers -- This column is available for syndication. If you are interested in carrying this column in your publication, contact the author.)
Thursday, November 7, 2019
Daniel Cameron's mission, should he choose to accept it
It's pretty much a fact that Ernie Fletcher would have been re-elected as Kentucky's governor in 2007 if not for the actions of Attorney General Greg Stumbo.
Stumbo took an exaggerated allegation of misconduct into political influence in hiring, turned it into a prosecution of Fletcher and many in his administration, and then the Democrats were successfully able to use the "scandal" to bring down Fletcher and elect Steve Beshear in his place.
Volumes could be written on how Stumbo misused his authority, how the press failed to report facts that would have shifted public opinion on Fletcher, and how the entire investigation was sour grapes from a political party angry because they'd been denied the governor's office for the first time in more than three decades.
But it's all said and done now, and on Tuesday Kentucky voters rejected Stumbo's attempt to take the attorney general's seat back over. But the fact remains that if not for Stumbo's personnel probe, there would have been no negatives in the way of Fletcher's re-election.
To a lesser extent, it could be argued that current Attorney General Andy Beshear played a huge role in Gov. Matt Bevin's loss on Tuesday. While it's true that Bevin's own comments were the major factor in why teachers led the charge to deny him re-election, Beshear's constant parade to the courthouse to sue Bevin's administration didn't hurt. And while -- surprise, surprise -- the media didn't report that Bevin won more of those legal battles than did Beshear, Beshear got all the positive press from them. Beshear even got praise from Stumbo for challenging the committee substitute legislative process, which is something Stumbo used often during his days as a legislator and House speaker.
So, this is the situation into which steps Attorney General-elect Daniel Cameron. As a Republican, he'll be going up against Democrat Beshear, who is moving up into the governor's office. What will Cameron do? Will he be as Stumbo was to Fletcher, or Beshear was to Bevin? Or will he be a go-along-to-get-along type, reflective of the attitude of his mentor, Sen. Mitch McConnell, who frequently angers conservatives for his willingness to acquiesce to liberals and not stand up against them and for conservative principles?
Cameron has already said he will do his job without regard for his personal beliefs, which is more than either Beshear or his predecessor, Jack Conway, did. Both of them refused to defend duly-passed state laws from court challenges. Watch police-themed television shows, such as "Law & Order: Special Victims Unit," and you'll frequently hear the phrase, "We don't get to pick the vic(tim)." This is similar. The attorney general's job is to defend state laws, whether the officeholder agrees with the law or not. The decision on the constitutionality of a law is not for the AG's office to decide. That falls to the courts.
But will Cameron be as aggressive in going after Beshear as Stumbo was Fletcher (criminally) or Beshear was Bevin (civilly)? For the sake of stopping his liberal agenda, we can only hope.
It's possible Cameron will be tested early. The legislature is still controlled by Republicans, with supermajorities in both houses. If the legislature has any gumption, it will ignore Beshear's budget proposals and move forward with its own agenda. Hopefully, this will include more pension reforms and school reforms. With the change in administration in the Executive Branch, it's doubtful that Beshear's Labor Cabinet will take any action should teachers engage in another illegal sickout to come to Frankfort and protest during the General Assembly session. It will be up to Cameron to prosecute them, since it's already been established that these sickouts are indeed against the law. Here's hoping he will.
With the GOP's sweep of all statewide office except the governor's race by commanding margins, the party has a clear mandate. And there are lots of rising young stars holding those offices. The governor's race in 2023 has to already be on the minds of some of them. Lots of people have already tagged Cameron as one of the brightest of those rising stars.
This is Cameron's chance to shine in a state that's trending Republican in every way except total voter registration. Does he become the face of the opposition to stand in the way of Andy Beshear undoing the gains of the last four years? Or does he stand aside and let this state go backwards? Here's hoping he lives up to the mission that's now set before him.
Stumbo took an exaggerated allegation of misconduct into political influence in hiring, turned it into a prosecution of Fletcher and many in his administration, and then the Democrats were successfully able to use the "scandal" to bring down Fletcher and elect Steve Beshear in his place.
Volumes could be written on how Stumbo misused his authority, how the press failed to report facts that would have shifted public opinion on Fletcher, and how the entire investigation was sour grapes from a political party angry because they'd been denied the governor's office for the first time in more than three decades.
But it's all said and done now, and on Tuesday Kentucky voters rejected Stumbo's attempt to take the attorney general's seat back over. But the fact remains that if not for Stumbo's personnel probe, there would have been no negatives in the way of Fletcher's re-election.
To a lesser extent, it could be argued that current Attorney General Andy Beshear played a huge role in Gov. Matt Bevin's loss on Tuesday. While it's true that Bevin's own comments were the major factor in why teachers led the charge to deny him re-election, Beshear's constant parade to the courthouse to sue Bevin's administration didn't hurt. And while -- surprise, surprise -- the media didn't report that Bevin won more of those legal battles than did Beshear, Beshear got all the positive press from them. Beshear even got praise from Stumbo for challenging the committee substitute legislative process, which is something Stumbo used often during his days as a legislator and House speaker.
So, this is the situation into which steps Attorney General-elect Daniel Cameron. As a Republican, he'll be going up against Democrat Beshear, who is moving up into the governor's office. What will Cameron do? Will he be as Stumbo was to Fletcher, or Beshear was to Bevin? Or will he be a go-along-to-get-along type, reflective of the attitude of his mentor, Sen. Mitch McConnell, who frequently angers conservatives for his willingness to acquiesce to liberals and not stand up against them and for conservative principles?
Cameron has already said he will do his job without regard for his personal beliefs, which is more than either Beshear or his predecessor, Jack Conway, did. Both of them refused to defend duly-passed state laws from court challenges. Watch police-themed television shows, such as "Law & Order: Special Victims Unit," and you'll frequently hear the phrase, "We don't get to pick the vic(tim)." This is similar. The attorney general's job is to defend state laws, whether the officeholder agrees with the law or not. The decision on the constitutionality of a law is not for the AG's office to decide. That falls to the courts.
But will Cameron be as aggressive in going after Beshear as Stumbo was Fletcher (criminally) or Beshear was Bevin (civilly)? For the sake of stopping his liberal agenda, we can only hope.
It's possible Cameron will be tested early. The legislature is still controlled by Republicans, with supermajorities in both houses. If the legislature has any gumption, it will ignore Beshear's budget proposals and move forward with its own agenda. Hopefully, this will include more pension reforms and school reforms. With the change in administration in the Executive Branch, it's doubtful that Beshear's Labor Cabinet will take any action should teachers engage in another illegal sickout to come to Frankfort and protest during the General Assembly session. It will be up to Cameron to prosecute them, since it's already been established that these sickouts are indeed against the law. Here's hoping he will.
With the GOP's sweep of all statewide office except the governor's race by commanding margins, the party has a clear mandate. And there are lots of rising young stars holding those offices. The governor's race in 2023 has to already be on the minds of some of them. Lots of people have already tagged Cameron as one of the brightest of those rising stars.
This is Cameron's chance to shine in a state that's trending Republican in every way except total voter registration. Does he become the face of the opposition to stand in the way of Andy Beshear undoing the gains of the last four years? Or does he stand aside and let this state go backwards? Here's hoping he lives up to the mission that's now set before him.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)